Publication View

Reply to Hagen & Sudarshan's Comment (1994)

Abstract
We show that the argument in Phys Rev Lett 70 (1993) 1360 is correct and consistent, and that Hagen & Sudarshan's solution has inconsistency leading to non-vanishing commutators of $[P^1, P^2]$ and $[P^j, H]$ even in physical states. This proves that many of HS's statements in their Comment are based merely on incorrect guess, but not on careful algebra.. Comment: one page, UMN-TH-1245/94

Publication details
Download http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9403156
Repository arXiv (United States)
Keywords High Energy Physics - Theory
Type text