Andreas Glöckner

Do People Make Decisions Under Risk Based on Ignorance? An Empirical Test of the Priority Heuristic against Cumulative Prospect Theory ∗ (2008)

Andreas Glöckner, Tilmann Betsch, Andreas Glöckner, Tilmann Betsch, Andreas Glöckner, ...

Brandstätter, Gigerenzer and Hertwig (2006) put forward the priority heuristic (PH) as a fast and frugal heuristic for decisions under risk. According to the PH, individuals do not make trade-offs...

Modeling Option and Strategy Choices with Connectionist Networks: Towards an Integrative Model of Automatic and Deliberate Decision Making

Andreas Glöckner, Tilmann Betsch

We claim that understanding human decisions requires that both automatic and deliberate processes be considered. First, we sketch the qualitative differences between two hypothetical processing...

Do People Make Decisions Under Risk Based on Ignorance? An Empirical Test of the Priority Heuristic against Cumulative Prospect Theory

Andreas Glöckner, Tilmann Betsch

Brandstätter, Gigerenzer and Hertwig (2006) put forward the priority heuristic (PH) as a fast and frugal heuristic for decisions under risk. According to the PH, individuals do not make trade-offs...

Multiple-Reason Decision Making Based on Automatic Processing

Andreas Glöckner, Tilmann Betsch

It has been repeatedly shown that in decisions under time constraints, individuals predominantly use noncompensatory strategies rather than complex compensatory ones. We argue that these findings...

Construction of Probabilistic Inferences by Constraint Satisfaction

Andreas Glöckner, Tilmann Betsch, Nicola Schindler

It has been shown that in decision making evaluations of evidence and attributes are modified. In three studies it was investigated if this finding of coherence shifts generalizes to real-world...

Modelling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making

Andreas Glöckner, Tilmann Betsch

We claim that understanding human decisions requires that both automatic and deliberate processes be considered. First, we sketch the qualitative differences between two hypothetical processing...

The Pros and Cons of Expertise: Routine Strength and Adaptation in Recurrent Acquisition and Disposal Decisions

Betsch, Tilmann, Haberstroh, Susanne, Glöckner, Andreas, Fiedler, Klaus

The strength of decision routines was manipulated within a computer controlled micro-world simulation which required that participants make recurrent acquisition and disposal decisions. One week...

A Micro-World Simulation to Study Routine Maintenance and Deviation in Repeated Decision Making

Betsch, Tilmann, Glöckner, Andreas, Haberstroh, Susanne

This paper presents a computer controlled micro-world simulation (COMMERCE) to study routine effects in deliberate repeated decision making. COMMERCE employs an economic scenario which requires the...

Can We Trust Intuitive Jurors? An Experimental Analysis

Christoph Engel, Andreas Glöckner

Jury members do not normally have the privilege of a complete, unbiased picture of the case. To make the best of patently incomplete evidence, they cannot but at least partially rely on their...

Information Processing in Decisions under Risk: Evidence for Compensatory Strategies based on Automatic Processes

Andreas Glöckner, Ann-Katrin Herbold

Many everyday decisions have to be made under risk and can be interpreted as choices between gambles with different outcomes that are realized with specific probabilities. The underlying cognitive...

Base-rate Respect by Intuition: Approximating Rational Choices in Base-rate Tasks with Multiple Cues

Andreas Glöckner, Stephan Dickert

Although intuitive-automatic processes sometimes lead to systematic biases in judgment and choice, in many situations especially this kind of processes enables people to approximate rational choices....

Experts and Decision Making: First Steps Towards a Unifying Theory of Decision Making in Novices, Intermediates and Experts

Britta Herbig, Andreas Glöckner

Expertise research shows quite ambiguous results on the abilities of experts in judgment and decision making (JDM) classic models cannot account for. This problem becomes even more accentuated if...

How Distinct are Intuition and Deliberation? An Eye-Tracking Analysis of Instruction-Induced Decision Modes

Nina Horstmann, Andrea Ahlgrimm, Andreas Glöckner

In recent years, numerous studies comparing intuition and deliberation have been published. However, until now relatively little is known about the cognitive processes underlying the two decision...

Investigating intuitive and deliberate processes statistically: The multiple-measure maximum likelihood strategy classification method

Andreas Glöckner

One of the core challenges of decision research is to identify individuals' decision strategies without influencing decision behavior by the method used. Br\"oder and Schiffer (2003) suggested a...

Leading with(out) Sacrifice? A Public-Goods Experiment with a Super-Additive Player

Andreas Glöckner, Bernd Irlenbusch, Sebastian Kube, Andreas Nicklisch, Hans-Theo Normann

We analyse two team settings in which one member in a team has stronger incentives to contribute than the others. If contributions constitute a sacrifice for the strong player, the other team members...

How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes

Nina Horstmann, Andrea Ahlgrimm, Andreas Glöckner

In recent years, numerous studies comparing intuition and deliberation have been published. However, relatively little is known about the cognitive processes underlying the two decision modes. In two...

The Endowment Effect in Groups with and without Strategic Incentives

Andreas Glöckner, Janet Kleber, Stephan Tontrup, Stefan Bechtold

The realization of market transactions often depends on decisions in groups in which members are anonymous and cannot communicate, but have interrelated outcomes. In a comprehensive study, we...